[05/26/22]
Posted on May 26, 2022 in HR Insights for Health Care, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On May 23, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that significantly impacts a litigant’s right to compel arbitration and the circumstances that may result in a decision that a litigant has waived its right to compel arbitration. The Case In Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., an hourly employee at a fast food franchise... READ MORE
Tags: Arbitration, Morgan vs Sundance Inc, right to arbitration, right to compel arbitration
[04/06/22]
Posted on April 6, 2022 in Health Law News, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
Recently, the Seventh Circuit, in Proctor v. Safeway, Inc., clarified what it means to act with reckless disregard in respect to claims brought under the False Claims Act (“FCA”). __ F.4th __, No. 3:11-CV-3406, 2022 WL 1012256, (7th Cir. 2022). In doing so, the court stated that authoritative guidance must be truly authoritative in... READ MORE
Tags: Authoritative Guidance, False Claims Act, FCA, Proctor v. Safeway, Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Burr, Seventh Circuit Court, United States ex. rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc.
[02/11/22]
Posted on February 11, 2022 in HR Insights for Health Care, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
The Plaintiff, a board-certified obstetrician and gynecologist, was initially granted clinical privileges at a North Carolina Hospital (the “Hospital”) in 2010. Privileges were granted according to the Medical Staff Bylaws. Notably, in this jurisdiction, the Bylaws “formed a contract” between Plaintiff and the Hospital. In May 2017, Plaintiff was informed that she would not... READ MORE
Tags: race discrimination, Section 1981
[01/21/22]
Posted on January 21, 2022 in HR Insights for Health Care, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the statute of limitations period for retaliation claims under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) begins to run on the date of the alleged retaliatory event, and not the date the plaintiff discovers the retaliatory event. Case Background In 2008, the plaintiff physician joined a Michigan-based... READ MORE
Tags: False Claims Act, FCA litigation, retaliatory event
[12/16/21]
Posted on December 16, 2021 in Health Law News, HR Insights for Health Care, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On November 30, 2021, a federal district court in Louisiana granted a nationwide injunction against the implementation of CMS’s Interim Final Rule requiring vaccines (“IFR”) for employees and providers at most health care facilities. The government promptly appealed that injunction. The Fifth Circuit has not yet ruled on the merits but on December 15... READ MORE
Tags: CMS Interim Final Rule, COVID-19, Vaccine Mandates
[07/12/21]
Posted on July 12, 2021 in Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
In The Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturned a 2020 Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) rule banning the use of electrical stimulation devices to treat patients suffering from severe self-injurious and aggressive behaviors. The court concluded the FDA... READ MORE
Tags: FDA, Food and Drug Administration, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Administration, Judge Rotenberg Educational Center
[09/02/20]
Posted on September 2, 2020 in Health Law News, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
The United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, recently issued an opinion reaffirming the need for counsel in qui tam cases under the False Claims Act (“FCA”). In particular, pro se plaintiffs, or individuals proceeding without attorney representation, filed suit against multiple defendants alleging qui tam claims under the FCA as well as 21... READ MORE
Tags: False Claims Act, FCA, qui tam
[07/27/20]
Posted on July 27, 2020 in Health Law News, HR Insights for Health Care, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
The U.S. Supreme Court recently expanded its unanimous 2012 ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church,[1] where it first applied to a parochial school teacher the “ministerial exception” to federal anti-discrimination employment laws. The exception is an outgrowth of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Free Establishment clauses, which protect the right of religious institutions... READ MORE
Tags: anti-discrimination employment laws, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church, ministerial exception, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, Religious Health Care Organizations
[12/20/19]
Posted on December 20, 2019 in Health Law News, HR Insights for Health Care, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
This week, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) rescinded a nearly 22-year-old policy opposing mandatory arbitration agreements in employment discrimination disputes imposed as a condition of employment. The 1997 Policy In 1997, the EEOC took the position that “agreements that mandate binding arbitration of discrimination claims as a condition of employment are contrary to... READ MORE
Tags: 1997 policy, Circuit City Stores v. Adams, EEOC, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, equal employment opportunity rights, Federal Arbitration Act
[11/21/19]
Posted on November 21, 2019 in HR Insights for Health Care, Litigation Analysis
Published by: Hall Render
On November 6, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals clarified the standard to establish a claim under the “regarded as” prong of discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and explained the type of evidence that supports an inference that an employer’s reasons for an employee’s termination are “pretextual” and actually motivated by discrimination. Factual Background A nurse anesthetist, Paula E. Babb, insisted her former employer... READ MORE
Tags: ADA, Americans with Disabilities Act, Babb v. Maryville, Discrimination